Scraper workflow

Google Ads scrapers : compare the best scrapers in 2026

For competitive intelligence on paid search and display creatives, pair vendor fit with legal review; automated access to Google properties is tightly policy-bound.

  1. Top 1
    Apify
    DeliveryCloud API · Managed browsers
    IntegrationREST API · SDKs (Node, Python, …)
  2. Top 2
    ScrapingBee
    DeliveryCloud API · Rendered HTML / JS
    IntegrationREST API · SERP & listing parsers (Google…
  3. Top 3
    ZenRows
    DeliveryCloud API · Rendered HTML / JS
    IntegrationREST API · SERP & listing parsers (Google…
  4. Top 4
    Firecrawl
    DeliveryCloud API · Crawl + map engine
    IntegrationREST API · SDKs (Node, Python, …)

Comparison

Google Ads scrapers compared in 2026

4 platforms in this hub

  1. #1Table rank

    Platform

    Apify

    Starting from

    Free tier + usage-based actors; paid from low tens $/mo (verify)

    Headquarters

    Czech Republic

    Delivery Cloud API · Managed browsers · Self-hosted …

    Integration REST API · SDKs (Node, Python, …) · Webhooks · …

  2. #2Table rank

    Platform

    ScrapingBee

    Starting from

    Credit-based API; entry tiers change. Verify live calculator

    Headquarters

    France

    Delivery Cloud API · Rendered HTML / JS

    Integration REST API · SERP & listing parsers (Google, Bing…

  3. #3Table rank

    Platform

    ZenRows

    Starting from

    Subscription + request tiers; promos vary

    Headquarters

    Switzerland (verify)

    Delivery Cloud API · Rendered HTML / JS

    Integration REST API · SERP & listing parsers (Google, Bing…

  4. #4Table rank

    Platform

    Firecrawl

    Starting from

    Free tier + metered crawl/extract; verify current limits

    Headquarters

    United States (verify)

    Delivery Cloud API · Crawl + map engine · Rendered H…

    Integration REST API · SDKs (Node, Python, …) · LLM-friendl…

Guidance

Google Ads scrapers : compare the best scrapers in 2026

Google Ads data spans public transparency surfaces, creative libraries, and landing pages, each with different access constraints. This hub compares vendors we tag for Ads-oriented extraction in our dataset.

Automated access to Google properties can change without notice. Prefer official APIs and transparency exports when they satisfy your workflow, and involve counsel before production scraping.

If you are doing competitive creative research, benchmark freshness and field coverage on the exact assets you archive, not a single demo keyword.

Separate “can fetch HTML” from “may use the data”: policy risk often dominates technical feasibility on Ads-related pages.

How to read the ranking

Ordering follows our editorial order within the Google Ads-tagged vendor set. Success still depends on current Google policies, rate limits, and your account posture.

Buyer checklist

Inventory which objects you need: creatives, landing URLs, spend ranges, geo, or policy flags.

Confirm whether your workflow can use official Ads or transparency APIs instead of raw scraping.

Log HTML or endpoint changes. Google updates layouts and consent flows frequently.

Document retention and PII handling if creatives include phone numbers or localized assets.

Does this page endorse bypassing Google login walls?

No. This is a vendor comparison hub. Follow Google’s terms and applicable laws; many Ads insights are available through sanctioned channels if you architect around them.

Next steps

Other use-case hubs

Same comparison layout, different workflow filter. Switch context without starting from scratch.